On April 28, 2025, the Indiana Pacers dominated the Milwaukee Bucks, winning 129-103 in Game 4 of the NBA Eastern Conference First Round Playoffs at Fiserv Forum. This victory secured a 3-1 series lead for the Pacers, putting the Bucks on the verge of elimination. Myles Turner’s stellar performance and the Pacers’ depth shone brightly, while the Bucks struggled without Damian Lillard, sidelined by a calf injury. This article explores the Pacers Vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats, providing comprehensive player breakdowns, tactical insights, historical context, and a preview of Game 5.
With the Pacers one win away from advancing and the Bucks fighting for survival, standout performances from Turner, Tyrese Haliburton, and Giannis Antetokounmpo defined the game. Expect detailed stats, advanced metrics, and predictions for the crucial next matchup in this intense playoff series.
Read More: Sacramento Kings vs. Lakers Match Player Stats
Game Summary
Final Score: Indiana Pacers 129, Milwaukee Bucks 103
Venue: Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee, WI
Key Moments:
- The Pacers showcased their depth, with eight players scoring in double digits.
- Milwaukee faltered without Lillard, who exited early and is doubtful for Game 5.
- Indiana’s third-quarter surge (40-25) blew the game open, cementing their dominance.
The Pacers’ high-energy, team-oriented play overwhelmed the Bucks, who relied heavily on Giannis but lacked offensive cohesion. Highlights, including Turner’s clutch three and Giannis’s powerful dunks, are available on NBA.com and YouTube for fans to relive the action.
Player Stats Breakdown
Indiana Pacers
Myles Turner (Center-Forward)
- Stats: 23 points, 9 rebounds, 4 blocks, 3/6 3PT
- Impact: Turner anchored the defense with rim protection and stretched the floor offensively, hitting a dagger three to seal the win.
Tyrese Haliburton (Guard)
- Stats: 17 points, 15 assists, 8 rebounds (double-double)
- Impact: Haliburton’s elite playmaking drove the Pacers’ fluid offense, creating open looks for teammates.
Andrew Nembhard (Guard)
- Stats: 20 points, 4/6 3PT, 6 assists
- Impact: Nembhard’s efficient shooting and secondary playmaking punished Milwaukee’s defense.
Pascal Siakam (Forward)
- Stats: 18 points, 7 rebounds, 3 steals
- Impact: Siakam’s two-way play, blending scoring efficiency with disruptive defense, was pivotal.
Aaron Nesmith (Guard-Forward)
- Stats: 15 points, 6 rebounds
- Impact: Nesmith’s hustle and transition scoring added energy to Indiana’s attack.
Team Stats:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| FG% | 52.3% |
| 3PT% | 38.5% |
| Assists | 32 |
| Turnovers | 12 |
| Defensive Rating | Held Bucks to 24.3% 3PT |
The Pacers’ balanced attack and stout defense stifled Milwaukee’s perimeter game, as reflected in the Pacers Vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats.
Milwaukee Bucks
Giannis Antetokounmpo (Forward)
- Stats: 28 points, 15 rebounds, 6 assists, 2 blocks
- Impact: Giannis was a one-man wrecking crew, but Indiana’s traps forced turnovers and limited his impact.
Brook Lopez (Center)
- Stats: 12 points, 5 rebounds, 2 blocks
- Impact: Lopez struggled to contain Indiana’s bigs and offered minimal offensive production.
Bobby Portis Jr. (Forward)
- Stats: 10 points, 12 rebounds
- Impact: Portis fought on the boards but couldn’t provide the scoring needed to complement Giannis.
Gary Trent Jr. (Guard-Forward)
- Stats: 8 points, 2/5 3PT
- Impact: Trent’s inconsistent shooting failed to fill the gap left by Lillard.
Team Stats:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| FG% | 44.1% |
| 3PT% | 24.3% |
| Assists | 20 |
| Turnovers | 15 |
| Defensive Rating | Allowed 129 points |
The Bucks’ offense hinged on Giannis, but their poor three-point shooting and defensive lapses were glaring.
Read More: OKC Thunder vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
Head-to-Head Player Comparisons
Giannis Antetokounmpo vs. Pascal Siakam
- Giannis: Averages 36.3 PPG, 12.8 RPG vs. the Pacers over 16 games. In Game 4, he notched 28 points and 15 rebounds but struggled against double-teams.
- Siakam: Averages 25 PPG, 7 RPG in the series, with 18 points in Game 4.
- Analysis: Giannis’s scoring prowess is unmatched, but Siakam’s efficiency and defensive versatility make him a tough counter. Indiana’s trapping scheme limits Giannis’s playmaking, while Siakam capitalizes on mismatches.
Tyrese Haliburton vs. Damian Lillard
- Haliburton: Averages 15.5 APG in the series, dictating the pace with pinpoint passes. His 15 assists in Game 4 carved up Milwaukee’s defense.
- Lillard: Hampered by injury, Lillard shot 3/14 in Game 1 and missed Game 4, leaving the Bucks without a key creator.
- Analysis: Haliburton’s health and vision give the Pacers a significant backcourt advantage, especially with Lillard’s status uncertain.
Advanced Metrics and Insights
True Shooting Percentage (TS%):
- Pacers: 58.2%, reflecting their efficient shooting and free-throw accuracy.
- Bucks: 50.1%, dragged down by poor three-point shooting.
Plus-Minus Leaders:
- Haliburton: +15 in Game 4, showcasing his game-changing presence.
- Giannis: +5, despite the blowout loss.
Pace and Efficiency:
The Pacers’ up-tempo style (8-2 home record) exploited the Bucks’ slower, half-court approach. Indiana’s 32 assists highlighted their ball movement, while Milwaukee’s lack of urgency was evident, as Giannis noted post-game. The Pacers vs. Milwaukee Bucks match player stats underscore Indiana’s ability to control the game’s rhythm.
Tactical Analysis
Pacers’ Strategy
- Crowding Giannis: Double-teams forced turnovers, reducing his assist total to 6.
- Haliburton’s Vision: His playmaking generated open three-point shots, with Indiana hitting 38.5% from deep.
- Defensive Pressure: Eight steals and seven blocks disrupted Milwaukee’s offense, holding them to 103 points.
Bucks’ Struggles
- Perimeter Woes: Milwaukee’s 24.3% three-point shooting (9/37 in Game 1) persisted in Game 4.
- No Lillard, No Spark: Without Lillard, the Bucks lacked a secondary playmaker, leaning too heavily on Giannis.
- Defensive Breakdowns: Indiana’s pace created mismatches, allowing eight Pacers to score in double figures.
Historical Context
The Bucks hold a 118-97 edge in 215 regular-season matchups, but the Pacers have surged recently, winning 8 of 11 games in 2024-25, including a 4-2 playoff series in 2024. Indiana’s 8-2 home record in their last 10 games at Gainbridge Fieldhouse favors them in Game 5. While Giannis averages 36.3 PPG against the Pacers, Indiana’s team-oriented approach has neutralized Milwaukee’s depth.
Predictions for Game 5 (April 29, 2025)
If Lillard Plays: The Bucks could boost their perimeter shooting and playmaking, making Game 5 closer.
Pacers’ Advantage: Indiana’s home crowd, depth, and defensive intensity position them to end the series. Haliburton’s playmaking and Turner’s two-way play will be key.
Key Matchup: Haliburton vs. Milwaukee’s guards. His ability to control the tempo could seal the series.
Score Prediction: Pacers 120, Bucks 112.
Team Stats Comparison
| Team | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG% | 3PT% | Turnovers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacers | 129 | 44 | 32 | 52.3% | 38.5% | 12 |
| Bucks | 103 | 42 | 20 | 44.1% | 24.3% | 15 |
Player Comparison
Below is a bar graph comparing series averages for key players (estimated):
- Giannis: 30 PPG, 14 RPG
- Siakam: 25 PPG, 7 RPG
- Haliburton: 16 PPG, 15.5 APG
- Lillard: 15 PPG, 5 APG (limited by injury)
(Note: Actual chart would be embedded via a tool like Chart.js or Tableau in a live environment.)
Performance Trend
FAQs
Who was the Pacers’ top scorer in Game 4?
Myles Turner with 23 points.
What were Giannis’s stats in Game 4?
28 points, 15 rebounds, 6 assists.
How can I watch Game 5?
NBA TV, 6:00 PM ET, April 29, 2025.
What’s the Pacers’ home record?
8-2 in their last 10 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.
Daniel J. Morgan is the founder of Invidiata Magazine, a premier publication showcasing luxury living, arts, and culture. With a passion for excellence, Daniel has established the magazine as a beacon of sophistication and refinement, captivating discerning audiences worldwide.
